So the probe is great when your client has a machine that's on 24 x 7 (such as a server as opposed to a workstation) but with many clients going to completely cloud-based environments, it can become a bit more difficult to dedicate resources to a probe machine. raspberry pi units all in including storage cost around $60-$70, and are perfect to act as a probe unit that can be put at a customer site in a network room, ...more »
I would like to setup some cleanup rules when specific conditions are met (such as if a device is a non-persistent vdi (as noted by CDP and customer/site placement) and hasn't checked in for X days then automatically remove it's listing from n-central.
Currently its not possible to apply a monitoring template to offline devices. This makes more work for a sysadmin. Support chat says, the device needs to be online. Me request is that each time we edit a template. its gets a verison number automaticly, and if the device comes online it needs to check which version it has. When the new template with a higher version number is detected. It should apply the new template. ...more »
A long time ago, N-Able thought they had fixed the reason duplicate devices were being created and decided to remove the ability to merge devices.
They did not (especially when sites were introduced and re-installs occur using the wrong id), so we've still been seeing duplicate devices being created ever since.
Please bring back th eoption to merge!!!
It would be nice to have a ping originate from the probe as well as from the Central Server.
There would only be one ping that would be used to determine "connectivity", however this way, the system could test to see if a firewall, or other edge network device, was LAN reachable as well as WAN reachable.
The Add Task drop down menu in the device details page has the update asset info option but the Add Task menu from the All Devices view does not. sometimes we need to update asset info on multiple devices and it would be nice to do a mass push of this task instead of having to click into each device and set it up.
Is it possible to create a checkbox to have the option to hide and show offline devices?
Daily i need to check a lot of workstations, because there are always a couple workstations offline for a couple of days and longer the checks in the monitoring stays red and does not show an actual and reliable state.
I would love to see a checkbox (as shown in the example).
Would be great to limit the number of devices that a client can create with own username. If I sell 10 license (agent based) to a client, the client can manage his installations with a limit of a number of devices I've set. If a client exceeds the number of devices that can be various ways: 1. client receive an email that alert him to buy more licenses 2. admin receive an email alert 3. admin on cmc web view an alert ...more »
Yellow devices on pending installation
how about marking Devices which have pending installations with yellow device buttons.
then we could select whether we want to have them warn or not warn.
this would be an optimal addition for onboarding new Customers - then we would see whether 100% of devices have successfully installed MAV
I think it would be real important to be able to access the web portals of network devices (ex: printers, firewalls, etc.) remotely from the Max RemoteManagement Dashboard. I remember when I used N-Able back in 2013 I had that ability. I don't think it would be too difficult to implement. Basically we just use the backend connection to a workstation/server to create a tunnel and access the HTTP/HTTPS portal of these network ...more »
If there would be an option to define which networkadapter has to be used during Patching via Patchmanagement
And on top of that a Timeframe for Patching - not only "14:00" but rather "18-22" Never on another time, and asap if within that timeframe
Then we could monitor Devices of "out of office" Workers (consultants etc.) correctly and deliver patchmanagement for these customers too.