Memberships [ 1 ] [+]
Activity Stream [+]
Ideas Contributed [ 43 ] [+]
Having a custom field in the Recovery Console to populate manually would be a major help, especially for the RMM Version, as it is basically impossible to distinguish devices by their B&R account name.
This way we could easily add a comment when adding a device to the Recovery Console, to which partner this device belongs to.
Recently the functionality to automatically remove a LSV if not available for 2 weeks straight has been introduced.
However there is a flaw in this logic as this also applies to devices, which are simply offline for a certain amount of time.
If the LSV is in "failed" state and the device goes offline for two weeks, the LSV will be removed upon the next device boot.
This should not happen in my eyes.
Currently we are missing a visual indicator showing Patchmanagement is active on the device in the north pane.
Since most other features, such as MAV, B&R or Web Protection do indeed show the green dot (or yellow / red respectively) which indicates the feature is active and installed, there is no such thing for patch management in the current dashboard.
we would like to have the option to be able to chose the profile additonally to the product for the silent installation mode.
For our scenario it would be really important to be able to set the reporting email receipient aswell via an installation parameter.
we would like to see an API Call to directly download the Asset Tracking SQL DataDump for better automation and further processing of the Asset Tracking data.
Currently the initial scan does add service checks for some specific services and that's it. I am certain it would make much more sense to add all services with "automatic" start type to the list of monitored services for the automatic detection. For instance if the server is running multiple MS SQL instances, none of them is automatically being added to the monitored services while I am certain this is something worth ...more »
we would like to have the ability to allow the client to locally trigger an update query for MAV through the MAV Systray application.
For Vipre Engine this option is give, hoever for Bitdefender Engine this would be much appreciated.
in special cases there will be environments where Workstations will not have internet access at all.
For such environments it would be great if the devices would communicate with something like a site concentrator which will collect the check results and upload these to the dashboard, bascially working as some kind of an upload proxy.
we would like to see something like an additional checkbox so you can allow the Backup Manager to attempt a direct connection in case the set up proxy is not available or responding.
We would really like to see Patchmanagement Support for Windows Core Servers for future updates.
As updates are a vital part of security and maintenance contracts and core servers are pretty common, for instance as Hyper-V Servers, this would be a great addtion to the feature list.
right now if you were to set up a storage node structure with seperate storage nodes per client you would have to set up an own VM for each storage node. We would like to be able to have multiple storage nodes running on one machine, which then splits up the data to seperate storage targets.
we would like to have an additional button in the AV Tab to clear the the corresponding tab contents.
This would help with keeping clear sight on the important contents rather than being overwhlemed with content that has already been dealt with.